Change Country
Welcome to Denmark
Please read the important information below before continuing to our website

By clicking on your client type to enter the website, you are confirming that you have read and understood the important information that is contained below, and you accept the terms of the Privacy and Cookies policy.


The UCITS ETFs listed on this website are funds under both Amundi ETF and Lyxor ETF denomination.

This website is published by Lyxor International Asset Management (LIAM), a French asset management company approved by the AMF (17 place de la Bourse 75082 Paris Cedex 02) under the UCITS (2009/65/EC) and AIFM (2011/31/EU) directives.

The website is hosted by on Microsoft Azure servers.

This website is subject to French and Danish law.


A professional client is a client that is either a per se professional client or an elective professional client (Note article 4 (1) 12 of Mifid )

Marketing Restrictions and Implications


Lyxor UCITS compliant Exchange Traded Funds (Lyxor UCITS ETFs) referred to on this website are open ended mutual investment funds (i) established under the French law and approved by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (the French Financial Markets Authority), or (ii) established under the Luxembourg law and approved by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (the Luxembourg Financial Supervisory Committee). Most of the protections provided by the Danish regulatory system generally and for funds authorised in Denmark do not apply to these exchange traded funds (ETFs).


This website is exclusively intended for persons who are not "US persons", as such term is defined in Regulation S or the US Securities Act 1933, as amended, and who are not physically present in the US. This website does not constitute an offer or an invitation to purchase any securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction in which such offer or invitation is not authorised or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. Potential users of this website are requested to inform themselves about and to observe any such restrictions.


Index Replication Process


Lyxor UCITS ETFs follow both physical and synthetic index replication process.


However, most Lyxor UCITS ETFs follow synthetic replication process. This consists of entering into a derivative transaction (a ‘Performance Swap’, as defined below) with a counterparty that provides complete and effective exposure to its benchmark index. Lyxor has adopted this methodology in order to minimise tracking error, optimise transaction costs and reduce operational risks.


A Performance Swap is a contractual agreement which is negotiated over-the-counter (OTC) between two parties: the Lyxor UCITS ETF and its counterparty. From a risk perspective, each Performance Swap ranks equally with other senior unsecured obligations of the counterparty, such as common bonds (i.e., same rights to payments). In the Performance Swap, the counterparty of the Lyxor UCITS ETF commits to pay the Lyxor UCITS ETF a variable return based on a pre-determined benchmark index, instead of a fixed stream of income (as in bonds). At the same time, the counterparty will receive from the Lyxor UCITS ETF the performance and any related revenues generated by the basket's assets (excluding the value of the Performance Swap) held by the Lyxor UCITS ETF. Information provided on individual ETFs includes data on the basket relating to the ETF and the percentage value of the basket represented by each asset. The information is relevant to the closing values on the date given. 


Investment Risks


The Lyxor UCITS ETFs described on this website are not suitable for everyone. Investors' capital is at risk. Investors should not deal in this product unless they understand, having obtained independent professional advice where necessary, its nature, terms and conditions, and the extent of their exposure to risk. The value of the product can go down as well as up and can be subject to volatility due to factors such as price changes in the underlying instrument and interest rates. If a fund is quoted in a different currency to the index, currency risks exist.


Prior to any investment in any Lyxor UCITS ETF, you should make your own appraisal of the risks from a financial, legal and tax perspective, without relying exclusively on the information provided by us. We recommend that you consult your own independent professional advisors (including legal, tax, financial or accounting advisors, as appropriate).


Specific Risks


·         Capital at Risk. ETFs are tracking instruments: Their risk profile is similar to a direct investment in the Benchmark Index. Investors’ capital is fully at risk and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Investments are not covered by the provisions of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (“FSCS”), or any similar scheme.

·         Counterparty Risk. Investors may be exposed to risks resulting from the use of an OTC Swap with any counterparty. Physical ETFs may have Counterparty Risk resulting from the use of a Securities Lending Programme.

·         Currency Risk. ETFs may be exposed to currency risk if the ETF or Benchmark Index holdings are denominated in a currency different to that of the Benchmark Index they are tracking. This means that exchange rate fluctuations could have a negative or positive effect on returns.

·         Replication Risk. ETFs are designed to replicate the performance of the Benchmark Index. Unexpected events relating to the constituents of the Benchmark Index may impact the Index provider’s ability to calculate the Benchmark Index, which may affect the ETF’s ability to replicate the Benchmark Index efficiently. This may create Tracking Error in the ETF.

·         Underlying Risk. The Benchmark Index of a Lyxor ETF may be complex and volatile. When investing in commodities, the Benchmark Index is calculated with reference to commodity futures contracts which can expose investors to risks related to the cost of carry and transportation. ETFs exposed to Emerging Markets carry a greater risk of potential loss than investment in Developed Markets as they are exposed to a wide range of unpredictable Emerging Market risks.

·         Liquidity Risk. On-exchange liquidity may be limited as a result of a suspension in the underlying market represented by the Benchmark Index tracked by the ETF; a failure in the systems of one of the relevant stock exchanges, Market Maker systems; or an abnormal trading situation or event.


The securities can be neither offered in nor transferred to the United States.




Any statement in relation to tax, where made, is generic and non-exhaustive and is based on our understanding of the laws and practice in force as of the date of this document and is subject to any changes in law and practice and the interpretation and application thereof, which changes could be made with retroactive effect. Any such statement must not be construed as tax advice and must not be relied upon. The tax treatment of investments will, inter alia, depend on an individual’s circumstances. Investors must consult with an appropriate professional tax adviser to ascertain for themselves the taxation consequences of acquiring, holding and/or disposing of any investments mentioned on this website. 

Further information on the risk factors are available in the Risk Warning section of the website.


Any fund prospectus and supplements are available at Information given about the past performance of the funds is no guarantee of future performance. No investment decision should be taken without reading the fund prospectus and any fund supplement of the fund concerned.


Although the content of the website is based upon information that LIAM consider reliable or comes from sources that LIAM consider reliable, LIAM have not verified such information. Lyxor make no representation or warranty as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of any information.  Any reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of the materials available on the website is prohibited.



This website uses cookies to make the website work or improve your user experience. Cookies are small text files that are saved on your computer or device, which are used for several purposes such as detecting preferences and improving site navigation. By continuing to use this website you consent for cookies to be used. For more details, including how to amend your preferences, please read our Cookies Policy.

By clicking on your client type to enter the website, you shall be deemed to have represented to us that you are not a U.S. person and that you are not located in the United States of America, its territories and possessions, and any State of the United States of America and that you are authorised to receive the information to and on this website.

August, 2015




We have a new home

Banner Amundi

Read more
19 Nov 2018

Passive or indexed investments provide low cost access to a very wide range of markets, and there’s next to no risk of them significantly underperforming the indices they track. So does that mean active managers’ days are numbered? We commissioned some research from the Lyxor Dauphine Research Academy – a partnership between Lyxor and Paris-Dauphine University’s renowned House of Finance – to try to find out.

Passive pushes forward

Index trackers are increasingly big business, but why has this kind of investing become so popular? In large part, it’s benefited from the steady, stimulus-fuelled rise of the markets over the decade since the financial crash. When markets are rising nicely, and the trends are clear, there’s little incentive to pay an active manager to try to eke out extra gains – especially when they could underperform significantly. For the advocates of active, the advent of more challenging market conditions in 2018 was a welcome chance for the managers to prove their worth.  

If only wishing made it so

Yet for all the commentary at the start of the year about how uncertain conditions, a greater dispersion of returns and a re-focusing on company fundamentals would assist alpha generators, most active managers have so far singularly failed to rise to the challenge as our current Alpha/Beta Allocator makes clear. Results year-to-date show results are in fact weaker than they were in 2017 – with just 31% of European active managers outperforming, down from 44% last year. And those struggles are apparent whether you’re looking at equities or fixed income.

So will passive march on and muscle market share away from active managers? Not necessarily. Market directionality, or the likely lack of, represents a real challenge to this new hegemony but there are other issues at play too.

At Lyxor, we offer both passive and active funds. Of course, we’rebig fans of passive – we’re one of Europe’s leading providers of ETFs, after all – but our research tells us active has a role to play too in any well-balanced, effective portfolio. Our research suggests the continued growth of passive will actually help, rather than hinder, active managers in time. 

Changing the perception

The first of our papers explored the link between the past performance of active funds and subsequent fund flows, and also discussed how smart beta ETFs might affect investors’ perceptions of the performance of their traditional active managers.

It showed that the proliferation of these passive funds has increased competition among asset managers which has, in turn, assisted investors. Put simply, the greater availability of smart beta funds has forced active managers to demonstrate they can deliver true alpha – performance above returns generated by exposure not just to the market, but also to systematic factor risks – if they want to continue gathering assets. If they can show, and repeat, that skill, they have nothing to fear from the rise of the ETFs. 

Is there an equilibrium level for active and passive?

The second of our papers dug deeply into the question of whether there’s an ideal balance between active and passive management, and whether the finding of that equilibrium would create better outcomes for investors.

It provides evidence that, at some point, the increasing use of passive funds could create more opportunities for active managers – helping them improve their performance and, in turn, increase the fund flows they attract.

It follows that there is a (theoretical) equilibrium market share for active and passive fund managers, although the researchers don’t seek to work out exactly what it is.  

Are we close to reaching that equilibrium? Probably not. It’s quite possible the share of passive funds relative to active could increase substantially from here before active managers are able to exploit the informational inefficiencies necessary to consistently beat the benchmark.

The paper also helps address a criticism sometimes addressed at passive funds: that index trackers are misallocating capital because they invest in stocks without any regard for their price. The authors suggest any such effects should be corrected automatically. That’s because the growing market share of passive funds would create extra opportunities for active managers, helping bring prices back towards fair value.

A force for good?

Claims active asset management is in terminal decline are are in fact exaggerated. In fact, the studies we sponsored show active management should actually benefit from the readier availability and greater use of passive strategies.

Ultimately, the increased role of index-based investing is more an opportunity than a threat for active managers. It creates a more effective equilibrium where each management style has a distinct role to play.

Based on the findings of our researchers we believe there’s an optimal split between active and passive management, and that the market will find it naturally over time.  Contrary to the hype, the inexorable rise of passive isn’t, in fact, sounding the death knell for active managers, although “middle of the road” managers – those managing close-to-benchmark portfolios – may lose out.

The more investors move toward passive strategies, the more active managers should be able to outperform and therefore attract inflows, until the point where they can no longer outperform (because their informational advantage wanes) and flows move back into passive funds.

And of course passive and active strategies don’t act in isolation – there are external forces at play. Developments in the markets, for example, could have an impact on their performance potential and, in turn, how attractive they look to investors. Passive strategies have been helped by the market’s consistent rise over the past few years, but that won’t go on forever. We’ve already seen the return of volatility over the past few months, and that’s still the kind of environment that creates opportunities for the better active managers.  There’s little doubt less effective managers will get left behind.

Read our new report:

alpha beta

Look no further than Lyxor

If you’re uncertain about which investment style to choose in any market, look no further than Lyxor’s ETF Research team. Each quarter it publishes the Alpha/Beta Allocator, designed to give you the lowdown on the markets where passive works best and where it might be worth paying more for an active manager’s skill. And if passive looks most promising then why not choose us? Over the years, we’ve built up one of the most exhaustive, innovative ranges of equity, fixed income and commodity ETFs your money can buy.

Explore our range

For professional clients only. All views & opinion are sourced Lyxor Cross Asset & Lyxor ETF  Research teams as at November 2018 unless otherwise stated. Past performance is no guide to future returns.   

This document is for the exclusive use of investors acting on their own account and categorised either as “Eligible Counterparties” or “Professional Clients” within the meaning of Markets in Financial Instruments Directive 2014/65/EU. These products comply with the UCITS Directive (2009/65/EC). Société Générale and Lyxor International Asset Management (LIAM) recommend that investors read carefully the “investment risks” section of the product’s documentation (prospectus and KIID). The prospectus and KIID are available free of charge on, and upon request to

The products mentioned are the object of market-making contracts, the purpose of which is to ensure the liquidity of the products on the London Stock Exchange, assuming normal market conditions and normally functioning computer systems. Units of a specific UCITS ETF managed by an asset manager and purchased on the secondary market cannot usually be sold directly back to the asset manager itself. Investors must buy and sell units on a secondary market with the assistance of an intermediary (e.g. a stockbroker) and may incur fees for doing so. In addition, investors may pay more than the current net asset value when buying units and may receive less than the current net asset value when selling them. Updated composition of the product’s investment portfolio is available on In addition, the indicative net asset value is published on the Reuters and Bloomberg pages of the product, and might also be mentioned on the websites of the stock exchanges where the product is listed.

Prior to investing in the product, investors should seek independent financial, tax, accounting and legal advice. It is each investor’s responsibility to ascertain that it is authorised to subscribe, or invest into this product. This document is of a commercial nature and not of a regulatory nature. This material is of a commercial nature and not a regulatory nature. This document does not constitute an offer, or an invitation to make an offer, from Société Générale, Lyxor Asset Management (together with its affiliates, Lyxor AM) or any of their respective subsidiaries to purchase or sell the product referred to herein.

Lyxor International Asset Management (LIAM), société par actions simplifiée having its registered office at Tours Société Générale, 17 cours Valmy, 92800 Puteaux (France), 418 862 215 RCS Nanterre, is authorized and regulated by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) under the UCITS Directive (2009/65/EU) and the AIFM Directive (2011/31/EU). LIAM is represented in the UK by Lyxor Asset Management UK LLP, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK under Registration Number 435658. Société Générale is a French credit institution (bank) authorised by the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (the French Prudential Control Authority).

Research disclaimer

Lyxor International Asset Management (“LIAM”) or its employees may have or maintain business relationships with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that LIAM and its employees may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. Please see appendix at the end of this report for the analyst(s) certification(s), important disclosures and disclaimers. Alternatively, visit our global research disclosure website

Conflicts of interest 

This research contains the views, opinions and recommendations of Lyxor International Asset Management (“LIAM”) Cross Asset and ETF research analysts and/or strategists. To the extent that this research contains trade ideas based on macro views of economic market conditions or relative value, it may differ from the fundamental Cross Asset and ETF Research opinions and recommendations contained in Cross Asset and ETF Research sector or company research reports and from the views and opinions of other departments of LIAM and its affiliates. Lyxor Cross Asset and ETF research analysts and/or strategists routinely consult with LIAM sales and portfolio management personnel regarding market information including, but not limited to, pricing, spread levels and trading activity of ETFs tracking equity, fixed income and commodity indices. Trading desks may trade, or have traded, as principal on the basis of the research analyst(s) views and reports. Lyxor has mandatory research policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to (i) ensure that purported facts in research reports are based on reliable information and (ii) to prevent improper selective or tiered dissemination of research reports. In addition, research analysts receive compensation based, in part, on the quality and accuracy of their analysis, client feedback, competitive factors and LIAM’s total revenues including revenues from management fees and investment advisory fees and distribution fees.

Connect with us on linkedin